What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?

A settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment are two very different legal processes in Idaho civil procedure. A settlement conference is a meeting between the parties to a dispute in order to try to reach a voluntary, out-of-court agreement. The attorneys for each side meet with the judge in a private setting and discuss a resolution to the dispute. The judge may make suggestions, but the parties must agree on the resolution. On the other hand, a motion for summary judgment is a legal motion that is filed by a party to a dispute requesting that the court decide the dispute without the need for a trial. If the motion is granted, the court will make a decision based solely on the facts of the case as presented by both parties. The main difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment is that the former is an attempt to reach an out-of-court agreement, while the latter is a request for the court to make a legal ruling.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between civil and criminal procedure?
What is a remittitur?
What is the difference between a motion to transfer venue and a motion to dismiss?
What are the remedies for civil actions?
What is a motion for reconsideration?
What is a negligence per se claim?
What is the pre-trial stage of civil procedure?
How do juries determine liability?
What is a change of venue?
What is a motion for sanctions?

What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts