What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?

A settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment are two distinct actions in a civil procedure case in Texas. A settlement conference is a meeting between the two parties involved in the lawsuit that is overseen by a court official. During the meeting, the court can attempt to help the parties reach an agreement and avoid the costs and time associated with a trial. On the other hand, a motion for summary judgment is a legal filing in which one party asks the court to issue a judgment after considering their presented evidence. The motion requests that the court make a ruling without a trial because the evidence presented is not disputed. Summary judgment can only be granted if no factual dispute exists and one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In summary, a settlement conference is an informal meeting between the parties to resolve a dispute out of court while a motion for summary judgment is a legal filing with the court that requests a decision based on the evidence presented.

Related FAQs

What is the purpose of civil procedure?
What is a counterclaim?
What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for a more definite statement?
What are the rules and procedures for jury selection?
What is a motion for summary judgment?
What is a motion for judgment on the pleadings?
What is a motion to dismiss?
What is a discovery request?
What is a judgement in rem?
What is a negligence per se claim?

What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts