What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?

A stipulation and an agreement are similar in that they are both legally binding contracts between two or more parties. The main difference is that a stipulation is used in civil procedure to narrow or limit the issues or facts that will be decided by the court. Stipulations are typically negotiated by lawyers for the parties and then filed with the court. An agreement, on the other hand, is a more general contract between two or more parties that sets out the terms of an arrangement. In Washington, an agreement can range from a simple handshake between two people to more formal written contracts. An agreement is not usually filed with the court. Both stipulations and agreements involve making promises and legally binding each party to those promises. However, the main difference is that a stipulation is specifically used in civil procedure and is filed with the court while an agreement is a more general contract between two or more parties and is not usually filed with the court.

Related FAQs

What is the purpose of civil procedure?
What is a settlement conference?
What is a motion for a directed verdict?
What are the elements of a breach of contract claim?
How does civil procedure differ from state to state?
What is the trial stage of civil procedure?
What is alternative dispute resolution (ADR)?
What are the court procedures for filing a motion?
What is the difference between civil and criminal procedure?
What is class action litigation?

What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts