What is the difference between a motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict?

A motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict are both legal proceedings that can be requested following the conclusion of a civil trial in Idaho. A motion for a new trial requests a retrial of the case. This motion must be filed within 10 days of the original trial’s conclusion and may be used if the party filing the motion believes that there was a mistake made in the legal procedure or that the verdict was otherwise unjust. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict requests that the original verdict be overruled. This motion must also be filed within 10 days of the original trial’s conclusion and may be used if the party filing the motion believes that the jury did not have enough evidence to form a valid verdict. In both cases, the court will review the evidence and legal procedure to determine whether or not the motion should be granted. If the motion is granted, the civil action will proceed from the point of the motion. If it is denied, the original verdict will stand.

Related FAQs

What is the motion stage of civil procedure?
What is the pleading stage of civil procedure?
What are the applicable statutes of limitations?
What is a joinder?
What is the standard of proof for a civil case?
What is a motion for an order of contempt?
What are the rules for joinder of parties in a civil suit?
What are the court procedures for filing a motion?
What is the statute of limitations for civil actions?
What is the role of a judge in a civil case?

What is the difference between a motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts