What is the difference between a motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict?

A motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict are two different types of civil procedures in Kansas. A motion for a new trial is a process in which a party to a case can ask the court to re-examine a case. This is typically done when a party believes the court reached an incorrect decision due to faulty instructions to the jury, new evidence that needs to be considered, or because the court incorrectly applied the law. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, on the other hand, is a process in which a party to a case requests that the court disregard the jury’s verdict and give judgment in favor of the party who made the motion. The party making the motion must show that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient or incorrect for the jury to reach the decision it did. In conclusion, the differences between a motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict are that the former is used to re-examine a case by the court while the latter is used to request that the court disregard the jury’s verdict and give judgment in favor of the party making the motion.

Related FAQs

What is a "slip and fall" lawsuit?
What is the purpose of a deposition?
What is the judgment/verdict stage of civil procedure?
What are the grounds for a restraining order?
What is a motion for sanctions?
What is the difference between civil and criminal procedure?
What are the elements of a civil lawsuit?
What are the steps in a civil trial?
What are the remedies for civil actions?
What are the rules for joinder of parties in a civil suit?

What is the difference between a motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts