What types of defective drug injury cases are there?

There are a number of different types of defective drug injury cases in Hawaii. One common example is a failure-to-warn case, where a plaintiff may argue that the manufacturer of a drug either inadequately warned of potential side effects, or failed to warn about a possible danger posed by the drug. Another common type of defective drug injury case is an inadequate-testing case, in which a plaintiff may argue that the manufacturer of the drug failed to sufficiently test the drug’s safety and effectiveness before releasing it on the market. A third type of defective drug injury case is a manufacturing defect case. In this scenario, a plaintiff may argue that the drug was either defective or contaminated due to poor manufacturing practices. In some instances, a plaintiff can also bring a design defect case, where they allege that the drug is inherently dangerous or otherwise defective due to its design. Finally, there may be cases that are based on violations of state or federal drug regulation. No matter the type of case, individuals who have suffered injury as a result of a defective drug, have the right to seek compensation for their losses. To that end, victims of defective drug injury in Hawaii may wish to speak with an experienced lawyer to help them navigate their next steps and determine whether or not they have a valid legal claim.

Related FAQs

What types of defective drug injury cases are there?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts