What defenses are available to those charged with defamation?

In California, those charged with defamation have several potential defenses available to them. Generally, individuals accused of defamation may assert that they are not responsible for the statement, that the statement is true, or that the statement is protected by a privilege or immunity. First, a defendant can claim they are not responsible for the statement in question. The defendant may explain that they had nothing to do with the statement at all or that they made the statement in good faith and without knowing it was false. Second, the defendant may argue that the statement is true. This is known as the truth defense and involves proving the truth of the statement through evidence. Third, a defendant may claim that the statement is shielded from a claim of defamation by a legal privilege or immunity. This could be an absolute privilege, such as a statement made by a member of Congress in the course of their duties, or a qualified privilege, such as a communication between two parties related to a contract. In summary, those accused of defamation in California may defend themselves by claiming that they are not responsible for the statement, that the statement is true, or that the statement is privileged or immune from a claim of defamation.

Related FAQs

How do you determine the difference between a “public concern” and a “private concern” in a defamation lawsuit?
Does a person have to prove actual harm in order to sue for libel?
Is a person required to sue for defamation in the state where the statement was made?
Is a person required to notify the other party before filing a defamation lawsuit?
How can a person protect his or her reputation from false and defamatory statements?
Does a person have to establish a special standard of malice to win a defamation claim?
What is the difference between libel and slander in terms of damages?
What is the standard of proof in a defamation lawsuit?
Are there any restrictions on the content of a settlement agreement in a defamation case?
Does a plaintiff need to prove actual knowledge or reckless disregard in a libel case?

What defenses are available to those charged with defamation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts