Is truth a defense to a defamation claim?

Yes, truth is a defense to a defamation claim in Oklahoma. In Oklahoma, truth is an absolute defense to a defamation claim, meaning that it does not matter whether the statement was made with malice or not. A defendant must prove that the statement is true in order to be found not liable for defamation as truth is a complete defense, and generally, no damages can be awarded. In order to prove that the statement is true, Oklahoma law requires evidence to support the truth of the statement. Evidence may include photographs, videos, receipts, contracts, or other records. If the defendant is unable to provide adequate evidence to support the truth of the statement, then they may be unable to successfully defend themselves from a defamation claim. In addition to truth, Oklahoma has a few additional defenses that can be used in a defamation claim. These defenses include opinion, privilege, and fair comment. If any of these defenses apply, then the defendant may be found not liable for defamation and protected from being sued. These defenses are very fact-specific, so it is important to consult an attorney if you are facing a defamation claim in Oklahoma.

Related FAQs

If a statement is true, is it still considered defamatory?
Are websites protected from liability for content published by its users?
What is the difference between libel and slander in terms of damages?
What are the remedies available in a defamation lawsuit?
What is the difference between libel and slander in terms of elements?
Is a person required to state a cause of action in a defamation lawsuit?
Is a statement considered defamatory if it is made in a business setting?
What is the difference between public and private figures in a defamation claim?
What is the limit of a person’s responsibility regarding third-party comments?
Does a person have to prove that the defendant knew or should have known the statement was false?

Is truth a defense to a defamation claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts