Does a person have to establish a special standard of malice to win a defamation claim?

No, a person does not have to establish a special standard of malice to win a defamation claim in South Dakota. Defamation is generally defined as a false statement of fact communicated to others that tends to harm or injure another’s reputation. In South Dakota, an individual can bring a claim for defamation when a statement has been communicated to a third person without privilege or authorization, which is defamatory, and results in damages. While some states may require a plaintiff to prove that the statement was made with malice, South Dakota does not. Rather, the burden is on the defendant to prove that the statement was true or that they had a valid privilege in making the statement. Therefore, a person does not need to establish a special standard of malice to win a defamation claim in South Dakota.

Related FAQs

Is a person required to state a cause of action in a defamation lawsuit?
What is the difference between libel and slander in terms of damages?
Does defamation law protect celebrities or public figures?
What is considered a false statement in a defamation lawsuit?
How do you prove damages in a slander case?
What is defamation law?
Is a statement considered defamatory if it is made in a business setting?
What is the difference between public and private figures in a defamation claim?
Is defamation a criminal offense?
Is a person allowed to use the defense of fair comment in a defamation case?

Does a person have to establish a special standard of malice to win a defamation claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts