What are “per se” defamatory statements?

In Minnesota, a “per se” defamatory statement is an untrue statement about a person that is meant to damage their reputation. If a statement is found to be per se defamatory in a court of law, the person who was defamed does not have to prove that they suffered any damages because of the statement- their legal right to have their reputation protected has already been violated. Examples of per se defamatory statements include accusations that a person has committed a crime, is not competent to do their job, or has a contagious or infectious disease. Depending on the context, some statements may not be considered per se defamatory, such as “I think Joe is incompetent”- this could be considered an opinion, rather than a fact. In Minnesota, there are some protections for people who make true statements, depending on the situation and their intent. However, it is important for people to be aware of their legal rights and to take care when talking about others. If a statement is found to be false or defamatory, the person who made the statement may be liable for damages and may have to face a lawsuit.

Related FAQs

Is an employer held liable for defamatory statements made by an employee?
Is a person required to state a cause of action in a defamation lawsuit?
Does a defendant have to prove truth in order to avoid liability for defamation?
Is a person allowed to use the defense of fair comment in a defamation case?
Are blogs considered “publishers” under defamation law?
If a statement is true, is it still considered defamatory?
Is a person allowed to use parody as a defense in a defamation lawsuit?
How do you prove the public impact of a statement in a defamation case?
How do you determine whether a statement is defamatory or not?
Is a person allowed to use an official inquiry as a defense in a defamation lawsuit?

What are “per se” defamatory statements?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts