What is the difference between libel and slander in terms of damages?

In North Carolina, libel and slander are both forms of defamation of character. Defamation is a false statement made about a person that damages their reputation. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, while slander is the spoken form of defamation. The difference between libel and slander in terms of damages is the potential severity of the penalty. Under North Carolina law, libel is usually more severe than slander because it is written or broadcast to a larger audience and can have a greater impact on a person’s reputation. As a result, the damages awarded in a libel case are typically greater than in a slander case. Slander, on the other hand, is usually less severe than libel because it is only spoken to a few people. The damages awarded in a slander case are likely to be much more limited, usually involving only the cost of correcting the false statement. In North Carolina, a person can also be held liable for negligent statements, which could be either libel or slander. In these cases, the burden of proof is usually lower, and damages awarded could be somewhat larger than those for libel or slander, depending on the extent of the damages caused.

Related FAQs

What are the remedies available in a defamation lawsuit?
How do you calculate damages in a defamation case?
Are blogs considered “publishers” under defamation law?
What is the statute of limitations for defamation claims?
How do you prove that a statement is false?
What is a public figure and how does it affect a defamation claim?
Are websites protected from liability for content published by its users?
How do you determine the difference between a “public concern” and a “private concern” in a defamation lawsuit?
Can a person be liable for repeating a defamatory statement?
Can a person be held liable for defamatory statements made on a third-party website?

What is the difference between libel and slander in terms of damages?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts