How is causation established in a defective products case?

In California, causation is established in a defective products case when the plaintiff, or injured party, can prove that the product in question was the direct cause of the injury or damage. Under California’s strict liability laws, three elements must be proven by the plaintiff: 1) the product was sold in a defective condition, 2) the defect was the direct cause of the injury or damage, and 3) the defect existed at the time the product was sold. The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff, and they must provide evidence that shows how the product caused the injury or damage. Expert testimony or an investigation of the product can help to show the cause of the injury or damage. In some cases, the plaintiff may be able to prove that the product was defective by showing that the seller or manufacturer sold the product with a defect, or that the product was not designed properly. Additionally, a plaintiff may be able to demonstrate that the product was used in the prescribed manner and still caused the injury. California courts will consider evidence from both sides of the case in determining if causation is established. Furthermore, courts may consider evidence of how the product was used, and the expected performance of the product, in determining if causation was established. The court must make sure that it is clear that the product was responsible for the injury or damage before awarding any type of damages.

Related FAQs

What is the “consumer expectation test” in defective products law?
What are my rights in a defective products case?
What is a “misplaced reliance” defect in a defective products case?
What is a “fraudulent misrepresentation” defect in a defective products case?
What is a “failure to warn” defect in a defective products case?
What is the “economic loss” rule in defective products law?
What is a product liability lawyer?
What is an implied warranty of merchantability in defective products law?
What type of buyer can bring a defective products claim?
What is a “state of the art” defense in defective products law?

How is causation established in a defective products case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts