Are there any defenses available to a product manufacturer in a defective products case?

Yes, there are several potential defenses available to a product manufacturer in a defective products case in Arkansas. Generally speaking, product manufacturers must demonstrate that their product was safe when manufactured and did not become defective through use or later alterations. If they can prove that their product was defective because of a component supplied by a third-party, they may be able to pursue a defense such as "contributory negligence". Product manufacturers may also be able to rely on the "state of the art" defense, which states that the product was made according to the best available technology or knowledge at the time of its creation. They may also be able to rely on the "assumption of risk" defense, which states that the consumer was aware of the risks associated with the product and chose to accept them. Finally, a product manufacturer may be able to claim that the product was misused or altered, resulting in the defect, or that warning and instructions provided with the product were sufficient to alert the consumer to the potential risks. Each of these potential defenses must be carefully considered and evaluated in the context of the specific Arkansas defective product case. An experienced lawyer can best advise a product manufacturer about the potential defenses available to them in their case.

Related FAQs

How do I know if I am a “consumer” in defective products law?
What is an example of a design defect in a defective products case?
What is a “market share liability” in defective products law?
What is the manufacturer’s liability for a defective product?
What type of notice do I need to give a manufacturer in a defective products case?
What type of evidence is required to bring a defective products claim?
How do I choose a product liability attorney?
What type of buyer can bring a defective products claim?
What legal procedures must I follow to file a defective products case?
What is the difference between a “strict liability” and a “negligence” product liability claim?

Are there any defenses available to a product manufacturer in a defective products case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts