What is the difference between a motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss?

A motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss in Washington State are two different types of legal motions related to drug crimes law. A motion to suppress is a motion filed with the court to ask the court to suppress evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights. When the evidence is suppressed, it means that the judge has agreed that the evidence should not be used in the trial. This is an important step in the defense of drug charges, as evidence can be the cornerstone of the prosecution’s case. A motion to dismiss is a motion filed with the court to have the charges against a defendant dismissed. This motion is generally filed when there is some legal defect in the charge, such as an absence of probable cause or insufficient evidence. If the court finds that there is a legal defect in the charges, it will generally grant the motion to dismiss. While both the motion to suppress and the motion to dismiss are important in drug crimes law in Washington, they are different motions that serve different purposes. A motion to suppress is used to suppress evidence, while a motion to dismiss is used to have the charges dismissed. In either case, if granted, the motion has the potential to significantly impact the outcome of a case.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a plea of guilty and a plea of nolo contendere?
What are the different classifications of drugs?
What is the difference between circumstantial and direct evidence?
What is the role of the jury in a drug trial?
What is the difference between civil and criminal forfeiture?
What is the difference between an acquittal and a dismissal?
What are the laws for manufacturing a controlled substance?
When is drug possession a crime?
What is the role of a plea bargain in a criminal trial?
What are the requirements for a search warrant?

What is the difference between a motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts