What is the difference between a motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss?

A motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss in Washington State are two different types of legal motions related to drug crimes law. A motion to suppress is a motion filed with the court to ask the court to suppress evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights. When the evidence is suppressed, it means that the judge has agreed that the evidence should not be used in the trial. This is an important step in the defense of drug charges, as evidence can be the cornerstone of the prosecution’s case. A motion to dismiss is a motion filed with the court to have the charges against a defendant dismissed. This motion is generally filed when there is some legal defect in the charge, such as an absence of probable cause or insufficient evidence. If the court finds that there is a legal defect in the charges, it will generally grant the motion to dismiss. While both the motion to suppress and the motion to dismiss are important in drug crimes law in Washington, they are different motions that serve different purposes. A motion to suppress is used to suppress evidence, while a motion to dismiss is used to have the charges dismissed. In either case, if granted, the motion has the potential to significantly impact the outcome of a case.

Related FAQs

What are the different drug laws?
What is the difference between intent to sell and possession for sale?
What are the common sentencing options for drug crimes?
What is the difference between a deferred adjudication and probation?
What are the consequences of a drug offense?
What are the requirements for a successful plea bargain?
What are the requirements for a search warrant?
What is the difference between a suspended sentence and probation?
When is an appeal possible in a drug case?
What is an inference in a drug case?

What is the difference between a motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts