What is the difference between a plea of guilty and a plea of nolo contendere?

The difference between a plea of guilty and a plea of nolo contendere in Kansas Drug Crimes Law is that a plea of guilty means the accused is admitting to the crime and accepting the punishment. In a plea of guilty, the defendant waives certain constitutional rights such as the right to trial by jury and the right to confront witnesses. A plea of nolo contendere means the accused does not admit guilt but will accept the punishment as if guilt had been admitted. This plea is only available in certain situations, typically involving misdemeanors and non-drug related offenses. This plea does not waive any of the defendant’s constitutional rights, but a conviction is still entered into the court records. Including both pleas of guilty and nolo contendere, Kansas Drug Crimes Law offers several options when it comes to plea agrees. Defendants should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each plea with an attorney prior to deciding which to choose. The effects of each plea deal can vary greatly, so it is important to understand the laws and consequences associated with each plea agreement.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a plea bargain and a plea agreement?
What is the role of the judge in a drug crime case?
What is the difference between an acquittal and a conviction?
What is the definition of a drug offense?
What is the burden of proof in a criminal trial?
What are the elements of a diminished capacity defense?
What are the effects of drug abuse?
What are the elements of a plea bargain in a drug case?
What is the federal penalty for drug possession?
What is the difference between a plea agreement and a plea bargain?

What is the difference between a plea of guilty and a plea of nolo contendere?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts