What is the difference between a plea of guilty and a plea of nolo contendere?

A plea of guilty and a plea of nolo contendere are two different types of plea agreements used in the court of law. When one pleads guilty, they are admitting to a crime and accepting the punishment that comes with it. A plea of nolo contendere, or no contest, is an agreement to accept the punishment without admitting guilt. In Minnesota, a plea of guilty has very serious consequences. If a person pleads guilty to a drug crime, they could face jail time, fines, probation, or a combination of all three. A guilty plea also results in a criminal record, which can make it difficult to obtain housing and employment in the future. A plea of nolo contendere does not carry the same consequences as a plea of guilty but it does indicate that the accused is not willing to dispute the charges against them. This plea does not result in a criminal record and the accused is usually offered a reduced sentence. However, if the accused violates the terms of their sentence, the court may revoke the plea and the original charges can be brought back up. Overall, a plea of guilty indicates an admission of guilt and carries with it more serious consequences than a plea of nolo contendere. A plea of nolo contendere does not admit guilt and is usually offered as an alternative to pleading guilty, but it still carries legal consequences.

Related FAQs

What is the purpose of the DEA?
What is a drug exclusion zone?
What is the role of the defense attorney in a drug crime case?
What are the legal consequences of a drug conviction?
What is the drug trade?
What is the standard of proof in a civil trial?
What is the difference between a plea of not guilty and a plea of nolo contendere?
What is the difference between a suspended sentence and probation?
What evidence is used to prove a drug crime?
What is the role of the police in drug law enforcement?

What is the difference between a plea of guilty and a plea of nolo contendere?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts