What is the difference between a condemnee and a condemnor?

Eminent domain law in California outlines the right of the government to take privately owned property for public use. In the event of eminent domain, there are two parties involved: a condemnee and a condemnor. The condemnee is the party whose property is being taken, also known as the property owner. The property owner has the right to receive compensation for the taking of their land and any property located on it. The property owner may be offered a certain price for the property or they may disagree with the amount and file an appeal. The condemnor is the party exercising eminent domain rights. This party could be the local, state, or federal government. It is the responsibility of the condemnor to determine a fair amount for the property and offer it to the condemnee. The condemnor is also responsible for the costs associated with the eminent domain process such as the relocation of any individuals or businesses located on the property. In summary, the condemnee is the party whose property is being taken, while the condemnor is the party exercising the eminent domain rights. The condemnee has the right to receive compensation for the taking of their land, which the condemnor is responsible for.

Related FAQs

What is the Condemnation Procedure?
Can I receive compensation for a partial taking?
How can I challenge the amount of compensation I am offered?
How can I challenge the public use of the property taken through eminent domain?
What is the difference between a public purpose and a public use?
Does eminent domain apply to all types of property?
Does eminent domain apply to renewable energy projects?
What is the procedure for resolving a dispute over compensation?
What are the limits of eminent domain power?
Are there any restrictions on the type of property subject to eminent domain?

What is the difference between a condemnee and a condemnor?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts