What is the difference between a non-solicitation and an anti-raiding agreement?

Non-solicitation and anti-raiding agreements are two different types of agreements that are used to protect employers in Michigan. A non-solicitation agreement is when an employee agrees not to solicit certain people or information from a former employer or competitor. This could include not attempting to recruit or hire employees from the company, not soliciting customers, or not using confidential knowledge for the former employer’s benefit. An anti-raiding agreement is an agreement between two employers that prevents one employer from attempting to recruit away the other employer’s employees. This generally includes a non-compete clause, which is an agreement to not recruit the other employer’s employees for a certain period of time. In Michigan, non-solicitation and anti-raiding agreements are enforceable, so long as they are reasonable and do not unfairly restrict employees’ rights to work. These agreements are generally used to protect employers’ interests during hiring and after an employee has departed.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between an at-will and a contract employee?
Are employers allowed to ask job applicants about their disabilities?
Are employees required to report workplace injuries or illnesses to their employer?
What is the difference between a company policy and an employment agreement?
Are employers allowed to monitor their employees’ phone calls and emails?
Can an employer ask for medical information from an employee?
What rights do employees have to be free from discrimination based on genetic information?
What is the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)?
Are employers allowed to require dress codes?
What is the difference between sexual harassment and romantic advances?

What is the difference between a non-solicitation and an anti-raiding agreement?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts