What is the difference between a judge and a jury?

A judge and a jury serve different roles in the court process in Massachusetts. The key difference between a judge and a jury is that a judge makes decisions on the facts of a case while a jury makes decisions on the facts and the law. A judge is a trained legal professional who is in charge of administering the court proceedings. The judge is responsible for making sure the trial is conducted in an orderly manner and that the court procedures are followed. The judge also makes sure the law is applied correctly and issues the verdict of guilty or not guilty based on the presentation of evidence. A jury is a group of individuals selected from the community to decide the facts of a case. The jury is tasked with determining the guilt or innocence of the accused based solely on the evidence presented. The jury listen to the evidence presented and decide, based on the law and the facts presented, if the accused is guilty or not guilty. Both judges and juries are an integral part of Massachusetts court proceedings. The judge is responsible for making sure that the trial is conducted in a fair, unbiased, and legal manner, while the jury is responsible for making a decision on the case based on the facts presented and the law.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a lawyer and an attorney?
What is the difference between a restraining order and an injunction?
What is a process server?
What is a motion for summary judgment?
What is a contempt of court?
What is a motion for a directed verdict?
What is a jury trial?
What is a motion for a mistrial?
What are jury instructions?
What is a writ of habeas corpus?

What is the difference between a judge and a jury?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts