How does a court decide to appoint a guardian?

In Washington, a court must make a decision about whether or not to appoint a guardian for a person who is unable to make decisions for themselves. To do this, the court must consider the best interests of the individual and the amount of protection they need. The court will often look at the person’s age, mental capacity, physical and mental health, lifestyle and resources. The court will then look at the type of protection and assistance they need. This includes ensuring their basic needs are met and making sure they are not taken advantage of by others. The court may also consider who is best suited to serve as the guardian. This person must be of legal age and must be willing to take on the responsibility. They must also be able to act in the best interests of the most vulnerable person. The court will also look into the potential guardian’s financial resources, abilities and skills. Once a guardian has been chosen, the court will review the situation periodically to make sure the guardian is fulfilling their duties. The court’s decision to appoint a guardian is a very serious matter. It is important to remember that it is done in the best interests of the individual, so they can get the protection and assistance they need.

Related FAQs

What is a guardianship of the incompetent?
How does a guardianship protect the ward?
What is a durable guardianship?
How are guardianship decisions made?
What are the rights of the guardian?
Can a guardian be appointed without a court order?
Who can become a guardian?
Can a guardian be held accountable for their actions?
Are there age restrictions for guardians?
How is a guardian compensated?

How does a court decide to appoint a guardian?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts