What is the difference between an immigration court and a regular court?
The difference between an immigration court and a regular court is significant. In the United States, immigration courts are administrative courts that are part of the United States Department of Justice and are responsible for adjudicating matters related to immigration. Immigration courts are responsible for determining whether an individual should be granted asylum, which is legal permission to remain in the United States, or whether an individual should be removed from the United States. A regular court, on the other hand, is a court with judicial authority over certain legal matters. This includes civil and criminal matters, such as family law, criminal trials, civil disputes, and other matters. Regular courts typically have a judicial officer, such as a judge or magistrate, who renders decisions based on the evidence presented and the law. Regular courts also hear appeals of decisions made by lower courts. In South Carolina, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) oversees all requests for asylum. Immigration courts are responsible for hearing cases related to asylum and rendering decisions based on the individual’s application and associated evidence. Regular courts, such as the Circuit Courts, Family Courts, and Magistrate Courts, are responsible for all other matters, such as criminal trials, family matters, and civil disputes. In short, immigration courts are responsible for deciding whether an individual should be allowed to stay in the United States, while regular courts are responsible for all other legal matters.
THELAW.TV ofrece respuestas en español a todas las preguntas sobre la ley de inmigración.La diferencia entre un tribunal de inmigración y un tribunal regular es que un tribunal de inmigración se encarga de asuntos relacionados con la inmigración. Los casos de inmigración tratados en los tribunales de inmigración incluyen, entre otros, apelaciones de negativas de solicitudes de residencia permanente, solicitudes de asilo, deportaciones, y peticiones de exención de inadmisibilidad. A diferencia de los tribunales regulares, los tribunales de inmigración no tienen jurados; en su lugar, el juez decide todos los casos. Además, los tribunales de inmigración no se rigen por lo mismo derecho que los tribunales regulares; los tribunales de inmigración operan bajo la Ley de Inmigración y Nacionalidad. En Carolina del Sur, existen cuatro tribunales de inmigración; el área metropolitana de Charleston, Columbia, Greenville y Spartanburg. Estos tribunales están ubicados en edificios de gobierno administrados por el gobierno federal y estatales. Los procedimientos de los tribunales de inmigración son diferentes a los de un tribunal regular; la regla final de un tribunal de inmigración es la ley federal, la cual es interpretada por el juez. Si la ley federal entra en conflicto con la ley local o estatal, la ley federal prevalece.
Related FAQs
What is the “one-year filing deadline”?How do I renew or extend my asylum status?
Are asylum seekers eligible for government benefits?
What happens if I am found to have a “credible fear”?
What documents are usually required to apply for asylum?
What is an “asylum-based adjustment of status”?
What are the risks of applying for asylum?
What are the benefits of being granted asylum?
Can I apply for asylum if my country is not listed as a safe country?
How can I get permission to travel while my asylum application is being processed?
Related Blog Posts
What Is Asylum Law and How Can It Help You? - July 31, 2023Exploring the U.S. Asylum Process: Steps to Follow - August 7, 2023
The Basics of Eligibility for Asylum in the United States - August 14, 2023
A Comprehensive Guide to Applying for Asylum in the U.S. - August 21, 2023
What Qualifies as a Credible Fear of Persecution Under Asylum Law? - August 28, 2023