What is the difference between breach of contract and bad faith insurance claims?

The primary difference between breach of contract and bad faith insurance claims is the legal cause of action taken. Breach of contract is a civil lawsuit brought against an insurance company for failing to fulfill its contractual duties, while bad faith insurance claims are brought against an insurance company for intentionally denying or delaying a claim for payment. Generally, breach of contract occurs when an insurance company fails to honor its commitment to an insured, as outlined in its policy. This can include denying a claim without a valid reason, refusing to pay the full amount owed on a claim, or making a payment late despite the policy’s payment deadlines. Bad faith insurance claims, on the other hand, are more serious and require a much higher burden of proof than breach of contract claims. In order for a plaintiff to make a successful claim of bad faith, they must prove that the insurance company acted unreasonably or deliberately acted to harm the insured party. Examples of this type of behaviour can include delaying claims in order to force the insured party to settle for an amount less than what the policy states, refusing to investigate a claim without good reason, or failing to provide the insured party with full information about their coverage. In New York, insurance companies have a fiduciary duty to their customers and are required to act in good faith and fair dealing when handling claims. If an insurance company acts in a way that denies or delays its customers’ rights to payment, they could be liable for bad faith insurance claims.

What is the difference between breach of contract and bad faith insurance claims?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts