What are the common defenses used by insurers in an insurance litigation case?

Insurance litigation is a common legal process used to resolve disputes between insurance companies and their policyholders. In an insurance litigation case in New York, insurers typically rely on a variety of defenses to protect their interests. One of the most common defenses used by insurers is that the policyholder failed to meet the policy’s requirements. This can include failing to accurately disclose information on the policy application, or failing to comply with the policy’s conditions and requirements. Another common defense is that the policyholder engaged in behavior that negates the policy’s coverage. This can include criminal behavior or intentional acts that were not covered under the policy. If it can be proven that the policyholder intentionally caused their own losses, the insurer may deny coverage of those losses. Additionally, an insurer may argue that the policyholder is not entitled to certain benefits due to policy exclusions. These exclusions are typically outlined in the policy and must be clearly understood by the policyholder. For example, if an insurance policy does not cover flood damage, the insurer can deny a claim for flood damage. Finally, an insurer may argue that the claim amount is too high. If the policyholder claims a higher amount than is covered under the policy, the insurer may deny the claim or provide coverage up to the policy limit. Overall, these are the most common defenses used by insurers in an insurance litigation case in New York. It is important to know and understand all of the terms and conditions outlined in an insurance policy in order to ensure that any potential disputes can be resolved fairly.

What are the common defenses used by insurers in an insurance litigation case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts