What are the common defenses used by insurers in an insurance litigation case?

Insurance litigation in Texas can be complicated. Insurance companies are represented by attorneys who use a variety of defenses to protect their interests. Common defenses used in an insurance litigation case include: 1. The policyholder has failed to abide by the contract’s terms. Insurance companies may argue that the policyholder has not fulfilled their obligations under the policy, such as failing to disclose important information, failing to pay premiums, or making a fraudulent claim. 2. The policyholder is not entitled to the benefits. Insurance companies may argue that the losses the policyholder is attempting to recover do not fall within the scope of the policy’s coverage. This may include losses that are excluded, such as war-related losses, or losses that exceed the policy’s coverage limit. 3. The policyholder caused or contributed to the losses. Insurance companies may argue that the policyholder contributed to or was at least partially responsible for the losses. This could include instances where the policyholder ignored warnings from the insurance company regarding certain risks or failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate the losses. 4. The policyholder’s losses are not as severe as they claim. Insurance companies may challenge the policyholder’s assessment of their losses or the value of the claimed damages. This could include the policyholder inflating the amount of the losses due to negligence or intentional misconduct. These are just some of the most common defenses used by insurers in an insurance litigation case in Texas. By understanding the various defenses used, policyholders can be better prepared when entering into insurance litigation.

What are the common defenses used by insurers in an insurance litigation case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts