What is the difference between a motion to compel and a motion to exclude in an insurance litigation case?

Motions to compel and motions to exclude are two distinct motions that may be used in an insurance litigation case in Georgia. A motion to compel is a legal request typically asking the court to order a party to produce certain documents or records, answer interrogatories, or to take some other requested action. The purpose of the motion is to draw out relevant and important information necessary for the court to make a ruling in the case. A motion to exclude is a legal request asking the court to exclude certain evidence or testimony from the trial. This is usually done if the evidence is irrelevant or is based on regulations or statutes that are not applicable in the current situation. This motion is usually requested when it is determined that the evidence may prejudice the jury or lead to an incorrect ruling. Both motions to compel and motions to exclude may be used during an insurance litigation case in Georgia. They serve different purposes, and must be used appropriately for the case to produce the desired result. The motion to compel is used to draw out any necessary information, while the motion to exclude is used to ensure that no unnecessary or incorrect information is introduced to the case.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a motion to compel and a motion to exclude in an insurance litigation case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts