What is the difference between a motion to compel and a motion to exclude in an insurance litigation case?

In New York, the difference between a motion to compel and a motion to exclude in an insurance litigation case can be quite significant. A motion to compel, also known as motion to compel discovery, is a motion to the court to compel a party to provide necessary discovery documents or reveal relevant information to the other party in a case. This motion is usually filed in response to a party that is not providing documents or information needed for a fair trial. On the other hand, a motion to exclude is a motion to the court to exclude evidence from the case, either because it is irrelevant or because it may be prejudicial. This motion is usually filed when one party feels as though the other party has provided evidence that should be considered inadmissible in court due to its lack of relevance or potential to be misleading or damaging to the case. In summary, a motion to compel in New York insurance litigation law is filed to compel the other party to provide necessary documents or information. Whereas, a motion to exclude is filed to exclude evidence from being considered in the case either because it is irrelevant or could be prejudicial.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a motion to compel and a motion to exclude in an insurance litigation case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts