What are the rules of evidence in an insurance litigation case?

In an insurance litigation case in Oregon, the rules of evidence refer to the rules that govern what types of evidence are admissible to be used in the court of law. Generally speaking, the evidence must be relevant, reliable, and material to the case, and it must be from a qualified expert source, such as a person with expertise or knowledge relevant to the case. Evidence can come in many forms, including written documents, oral testimony, photographs, and physical objects. Written documents, such as contracts or police reports, must be authenticated by testimonies from witnesses or other evidence. Oral testimony must come from a witness who has direct knowledge of the case. Photographs and physical objects must be accurately identified and be relevant in some way to the case at hand. Oregon courts will usually admit evidence that does not meet the above criteria, but the judge has the discretion to exclude the evidence. In addition, to be admitted, evidence must not be unduly prejudicial or inflammatory. This means that it must not inflame the passions of the jury, or it will be excluded. In an insurance litigation case, all of the evidence must be relevant and reliable in order for it to be allowed in court. The rules of evidence provide a standard of proof for the court to judge the evidence, so that the court can make a fair decision on the case.

Related FAQs

What are the rules of evidence in an insurance litigation case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts