What is a motion for a directed verdict in an insurance litigation case?

A Motion for a Directed Verdict in an insurance litigation case is when a party, usually the defendant, requests that the court has them declared as the winner of the case, without the jury determining the outcome. This means that the party requesting the Motion for a Directed Verdict believes they have presented enough evidence to prove their case, without the jury deciding the outcome. In the state of Texas, the court may grant a Motion for a Directed Verdict after a party has presented evidence but before the jury has made its ruling. This means that the court can decide that the requesting party has already proven their case, and that the jury does not need to deliberate further. However, the court is not allowed to make any determination on the facts presented. They must still allow the jury to determine the facts, as they are best-suited to making a determination of whether the provided evidence is true or not. A Motion for a Directed Verdict can be requested by either side whenever an insurance litigation case is in court. The court will then decide whether or not to grant it. If the Motion for a Directed Verdict is granted, the case ends without going to the jury. If it is not granted, the jury will determine the outcome of the case.

Related FAQs

What is a motion for a directed verdict in an insurance litigation case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts