What is the difference between diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality?

The difference between diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality lies in the way international law is applied. Diplomatic immunity is an international law that gives foreign diplomats immunity from being prosecuted by the state they are visiting. This means that, no matter what the diplomat does while in the state they are visiting, they cannot be held criminally liable or sued by any individual or business within the state. Extraterritoriality is a rule of international law that gives a foreign state limited rights and privileges within the borders of a host state. This means that citizens of the foreign state can be granted limited civil rights within South Carolina, such as the right to own property and pursue certain professions. The difference between diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality is that diplomatic immunity is a form of immunity granted to a foreign diplomat while they are in the host state, while extraterritoriality is a form of limited rights granted to a foreign state within the host state. In South Carolina, diplomats are generally granted diplomatic immunity, while citizens of other states are generally granted extraterritoriality.

Related FAQs

What is the International Law of State Succession?
What is the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings (TBT)?
What is the World Bank?
What is the International Court of Justice (ICJ)?
What is the International Telecommunications Union (ITU)?
What is the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)?
What is jurisdiction in international law?
What is the International Law of Sanctions?
What is the International Convention on Nuclear Safety (INSC)?
How is international law enforced?

What is the difference between diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts