What is the difference between civil law and religious law?

Civil law and religious law, while both considered forms of jurisprudence, have distinct differences. Civil law is a body of laws created and enforced by government that determine how people of a society interact with each other. This form of law is based on the secular society, meaning it has no relation to any one specific religion or religious system, and is a blanket set of guidelines. In Washington, civil law is handled by courts and other means of dispute resolution procedures. Religious law, otherwise known as canon law, is based on edicts and laws created within a religion or religious system. It is designed to provide a set of morals and ethics for adherents of the religion to follow. Religion is a highly personal experience, so this form of law can vary greatly depending on the faith of the individual. In Washington, religious law is typically only binding to members of the specific religious group. It is not enforced by the courts or other state authorities. In summary, the main difference between civil law and religious law is that civil law is a secular set of guidelines enforced by the government, while religious law is an individual set of morals and ethics used within a specific faith.

Related FAQs

How have different interpretations of jurisprudence law shaped its development?
What are the principles of jurisprudence law?
What are the major doctrines in jurisprudence law?
What is the difference between statutory interpretation and judicial interpretation?
How does jurisprudence law address social issues?
What are the implications of jurisprudence law for social justice?
What is the role of public opinion in the interpretation of jurisprudence law?
How does jurisprudence law determine the rights of individuals?
What is the purpose of private law in jurisprudence law?
What is the role of the judge in jurisprudence law?

What is the difference between civil law and religious law?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts