What is the process for establishing causation in a medical device injury case?

Establishing causation in a medical device injury case can be a complex and lengthy process. In Pennsylvania, a plaintiff who is claiming a medical device injury must offer evidence that the device in question was the direct cause of the injury. To support this claim, the plaintiff has several options. One option is to show that the device was designed or manufactured in a way that caused it to be unreasonably dangerous when it was used as intended. This is also referred to as a “design defect” or “manufacturing defect” case. To prove this, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the device was defectively designed or manufactured, and that this defect caused the injury. A plaintiff can also argue that the manufacturer or retailer of the device failed to provide adequate warnings or instructions about the safe use of the device. To prove this, a plaintiff must show that the product lacked appropriate warnings or instructions, and that the absence of this information was the direct cause of the injury. Finally, a plaintiff can allege that the manufacturer or retailer was negligent in its design or manufacture of the device. To prove this, the plaintiff must show that the product was unreasonably dangerous and that the manufacturer or retailer was aware of this fact. All of these options require the plaintiff to provide evidence to prove that the device was the direct cause of the injury. The evidence needed to establish causation will vary depending on the particular facts of the case, and it is important that a plaintiff enlist the help of a qualified attorney to assist in the process.

Related FAQs

What is the process for establishing causation in a medical device injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts