Is there a difference between mediation and conciliation?

Yes, there is a difference between mediation and conciliation. Mediation is a process in which two or more parties attempt to settle a dispute with the help of a neutral third party, known as a mediator. The mediator doesn’t make decisions for the parties, rather, they help the parties reach an agreement that both sides can live with. Mediation is a voluntary process and the terms of the agreement are reached through discussion and compromise. Conciliation is a process in which a neutral third party, the conciliator, helps the parties communicate and reach an agreement. The conciliator can make recommendations to the parties, but the agreement is ultimately negotiated and agreed upon by both parties. In some cases, the conciliator can even draft an agreement and present it to the parties for their consideration. In Texas, mediation is a required step in family law proceedings involving the division of property, child support, or child custody. The court will usually appoint a mediator in these cases. Conciliation isn’t used as often in Texas, but can be helpful in civil disputes. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the case may still move forward to trial.

Related FAQs

How can I ensure that my rights are enforced in a mediated settlement?
How do I know if a mediator is qualified to handle my case?
Are there any limits on the time frame that mediation can take?
Is mediation a form of alternative dispute resolution?
Is there a difference between mediation and conciliation?
Are there any special considerations I should keep in mind when engaging in mediation?
What skills do mediators need in order to effectively resolve disputes?
How does mediation differ from arbitration?
How is a mediator chosen for a case?
What are the procedural rules for mediation?

Is there a difference between mediation and conciliation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts