When should mediation be used instead of litigation?

Mediation is an alternative to litigation that is used to resolve disputes between two or more parties. Mediation is typically less expensive and less time-consuming than litigation, and is often used to resolve family law matters such as divorces, child custody disputes, and other types of disputes. In California, mediation should be used instead of litigation in cases where the dispute involves complex issues or when a trial is likely to take a long time. It can also be used to prevent a lawsuit from being filed in the first place. Mediation can also be used when the parties involved have a close personal relationship and may be able to come to an agreement without having to go through the legal system. Mediation is also used to try to find a win-win solution that both parties can agree to, which is often much more beneficial than a resolution that is imposed by a judge after a lengthy trial. Mediation is also used to reduce stress and anxiety that is often associated with litigation. In short, mediation should be used instead of litigation when there are complex issues, when the parties have a close personal relationship, and when it is possible to come to an agreement without having to go to trial.

Related FAQs

Is there any recourse if the agreement reached in mediation is not respected?
How is mediation used in alternative dispute resolution?
What happens when the mediated agreement is challenged in court?
Are there any restrictions on the topics that can be discussed in mediation?
What happens if the parties cannot reach an agreement and the mediator is unable to help them?
Can mediation be used to address property disputes?
Is there a difference between private and court-ordered mediation?
How can I find a mediator in my area?
Is mediation binding on the parties involved?
How does the mediator help the parties reach an agreement?

When should mediation be used instead of litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts