What are the differences between private and court-ordered mediation?

Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution in which participating parties reach a mutually satisfactory agreement. It is a voluntary process, which is often used to resolve disagreements in Washington. Mediation can be court-ordered or private, though the two differ significantly. In court-ordered mediation, the mediator is appointed and supervised by the court system. The mediator is an outside third party and is usually a trained professional with knowledge in the area of law relevant to the dispute. The proceedings in court-ordered mediation are often confidential, with any agreement reached subject to court review and approval. Private mediation is quite different. Here, the mediator is typically hired by the parties involved in the dispute. The mediator is usually a volunteer or professionally trained person but is not supervised or appointed by the court. The parties themselves decide on the mediator and which rules will be used in the process. Furthermore, the settlement reached in private mediation is not subject to court review. Both private and court-ordered mediation involve negotiations and can be successful in resolving disputes. The differences between the two are significant, and the choice of which type to pursue depends on the nature of the dispute.

Related FAQs

What is the role of the mediator in protecting the rights of the parties?
Are there any limits to the extent of mediation?
How can mediators ensure a fair and impartial outcome?
How can parties ensure their interests are respected during mediation?
How much time should be allotted to each side during mediation?
What types of evidence are admissible in mediation?
Are there any restrictions on who can be a mediator?
Is mediation confidential?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of mediation?
What are the advantages of engaging in mediation?

What are the differences between private and court-ordered mediation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts