What is the difference between libel and slander?

Libel and slander are both tort offenses related to defamation. They each involve the wrongful and malicious release of false information about an individual or company. The main difference between libel and slander is the way in which the false information is released. Libel is a written or published defamation, such as in a newspaper article or website. Slander is oral defamation, released verbally or by an action. In Texas, libel and slander are both treated as civil offenses. In a civil lawsuit, a plaintiff may seek compensation for damages that result from the false statements. Damages can include physical or emotional harm, loss of reputation, and financial losses. Libel is often seen as a more serious offense than slander, because the false information is more widely spread. A libelous statement can also be more difficult to disprove than a slanderous one. To win a lawsuit for libel, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant made false statements that caused harm. In order to be considered libel or slander, the statement must be untrue or misrepresentative of the plaintiff. Statements of opinion, even if highly critical, typically do not count as libel or slander. Additionally, if a defendant can provide proof that their statement is true, a libel or slander lawsuit may not be successful.

Related FAQs

What is the impact of media law on freedom of the press?
What are the limits on government control of the media?
How does media law relate to the Freedom of Information Act?
What restrictions are placed on foreign media owners?
What are the laws preventing deceptive advertising?
What are the laws regarding media ownership and consolidation?
What is the purpose of media regulation?
How does media law affect the entertainment industry?
What is the media's responsibility to report accurate news?
How does media law protect journalists from government censorship?

What is the difference between libel and slander?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts