What are some of the most common defenses used in maritime injury cases?

Maritime injury law is an area of law that applies to accidents that occur in navigable waters. In South Dakota, the courts recognize the unique characteristics of this type of law, and thus, the defenses used in maritime injury cases are often different from those used in other types of personal injury cases. One of the most common defenses in maritime injury cases is contributory negligence. This defense essentially claims that the injured party is partially to blame for their injuries because they failed to exercise a reasonable degree of care for their own safety. This can include failing to wear a life jacket, ignoring clear warnings, or engaging in other risky activities. Another common defense is the assumption of risk. This defense states that the injured party voluntarily assumed the risks associated with the activity in which they were involved. This could include claiming that the injured party should have been aware of the potential risks, and that they agreed to take those risks in exchange for participating. A third common defense is comparative negligence. This defense claims that the injured party is partially to blame for their injuries. It allows the defense to argue that, even if the vessel captain was negligent, the injured party is still partially responsible for their own injuries due to their own negligence. Finally, a fourth common defense is unseaworthiness. This defense claims that the vessel in question was not sufficiently fit to be on the water, either due to lack of maintenance or other factors related to the vessel. However, this defense is typically more difficult to prove, as it requires the defense to demonstrate that the vessel was not reasonably fit for its intended use. Overall, the defenses used in maritime injury cases are often different from those used in other personal injury cases. The defenses outlined above are some of the most common defenses used in maritime injury cases, and each one typically requires the defendant to prove that the injured party played some role in causing their own injuries.

What are some of the most common defenses used in maritime injury cases?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts