What evidence must I present in order to prove causation in a medical malpractice claim?

In order to prove causation in a medical malpractice claim in Tennessee, a plaintiff must present evidence showing that the negligent act or omission of the defendant health care provider was the direct and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury. In other words, the plaintiff must be able to show that the injury would not have occurred “but for” the negligence of the defendant. In order to prove causation, the plaintiff must submit evidence that the defendant’s actions constituted a breach of their standard of care. This evidence typically comes from expert testimony from a medical expert that is familiar with the standard of care that is expected of health care providers in that particular type of situation. The plaintiff must also present evidence that the harm they experienced was a direct result of the defendant’s breach. In addition, the plaintiff needs to be able to show that the harm they experienced was foreseeable. This means that the harm would have been foreseeable to a reasonable health care provider in the same field, which means that the harm was directly related to the defendant’s negligence. Lastly, the plaintiff must be able to present evidence that they suffered actual physical injury or harm as a result of the defendant’s negligence. This evidence can include medical records, expert testimony, or other forms of evidence that can demonstrate the plaintiff suffered physical harm as a direct result of the defendant’s negligent act or omission. By presenting this type of evidence, a plaintiff will be able to demonstrate that the defendant’s negligence was the direct and proximate cause of their injury and prove causation in a medical malpractice claim.

What evidence must I present in order to prove causation in a medical malpractice claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts