What do I need to know about the burden of proof in a medical malpractice case?

In North Carolina, the burden of proof in medical malpractice cases revolves around the concept of negligence. Negligence is the failure to behave with the level of care that a reasonable person in the same situation would display. To establish negligence, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case must prove four things: (1) that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care; (2) that duty was breached; (3) the breach caused an injury; and (4) that injury proximately caused the damages claimed. In North Carolina, the burden of proof is higher in medical malpractice cases than in many other types of cases. This is known as the “clear and convincing” burden of proof. This means that for the plaintiff to prevail, they must prove, clearly and convincingly, that the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the injury. The burden of proof also shifts in medical malpractice cases. North Carolina courts have held that the burden of proof shifts to the defendant in medical malpractice cases in which the plaintiff can show that the defendant violated the applicable standard of care. This means that once the plaintiff has proven that a defendant violated the applicable standard of care, the defendant must prove that their breach of care did not cause the injury. In summary, the burden of proof in a medical malpractice case in North Carolina is high. The plaintiff must prove the four elements of negligence, and in cases where the plaintiff has proven that the defendant violated the applicable standard of care, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove that their breach of care did not cause the injury.

What do I need to know about the burden of proof in a medical malpractice case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts