What are the differences between a medical malpractice claim and a products liability claim?

Medical malpractice and products liability claims are two very different legal remedies. Medical malpractice occurs when a health care provider fails to provide medical care that meets the accepted standard of practice as defined by the medical profession and results in injury or death to the patient. On the other hand, products liability claims are addressed when one has been harmed by a defective product. In Michigan, a medical malpractice claim requires a patient to show that the health care provider was negligent in treating them, which could mean that the provider failed to adhere to the accepted standard of care, failed to properly diagnose an illness, or failed to provide proper follow-up care. If a patient is successful in proving that a health care provider was negligent, they can be held liable for damages which can include medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Products liability claims are when a consumer is injured due to a defect in a product they had purchased. For instance, if a consumer purchased a defective product that caused injury, they can file a products liability claim. The claim must be that the product was either defectively manufactured, defectively designed, or that inadequate warnings and instructions were given. The consumer must be able to prove that the defective product caused their injury and that the product was unreasonably dangerous. In summary, medical malpractice claims and products liability claims are different. Medical malpractice claims are based on the medical provider not providing the accepted standard of care to the patient that caused injury and products liability claims are based on a defectively manufactured product that caused injury to the consumer.

What are the differences between a medical malpractice claim and a products liability claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts