What is the difference between economic and non-economic damages in a medical malpractice case?

In Michigan, economic and non-economic damages are the two main types of damages that can be awarded in a medical malpractice case. Economic damages are those that cover the tangible costs associated with the injury or illness. These costs can include medical expenses, lost wages, and property damage. Non-economic damages are awarded for more abstract losses, such as pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress. Economic damages are easier to calculate because they will often have an exact dollar amount associated with them. For example, the plaintiff can provide proof of medical bills, lost wages, and other related costs to receive compensation. Non-economic damages are more subjective, because they are not always directly tied to a specific dollar amount. It is up to the court to determine the amount of non-economic damages that should be awarded. Overall, economic damages are used to recoup the actual costs associated with a medical malpractice case, while non-economic damages are received to compensate the plaintiff for intangible losses, such as emotional distress. Each type of damage is important to the plaintiff, as they are both necessary to receive full compensation for the injuries suffered due to malpractice.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between economic and non-economic damages in a medical malpractice case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts