What is the difference between economic and non-economic damages in a medical malpractice case?

In a medical malpractice case in Pennsylvania, economic damages are meant to compensate a plaintiff for any expenses associated with their injury, including medical bills, lost wages due to time away from work, and other expenses related to the medical malpractice. Non-economic damages, on the other hand, are meant to compensate the plaintiff for intangible losses and suffering, such as physical pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress caused by the medical malpractice. Economic damages are often easier to quantify, as they are tied to specific monetary costs. Non-economic damages, however, are more subjective, as they do not have a direct monetary value. The amount of non-economic damages a plaintiff is entitled to is often determined by the severity of the injury and the amount of pain and suffering experienced by the plaintiff. When evaluating a medical malpractice case, courts will generally look at both economic and non-economic damages to determine the amount of compensation to award the plaintiff. The amount of economic damages is usually easier to calculate, as it is tied to specific expenses, but non-economic damages are typically more difficult to assess. Therefore, when filing a medical malpractice lawsuit in Pennsylvania, it is important to have an experienced attorney to help ensure that a plaintiff receives fair compensation for both economic and non-economic damages.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between economic and non-economic damages in a medical malpractice case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts