What is the difference between a medical malpractice claim and an intentional tort claim?

Medical malpractice and intentional tort claims are two different types of legal cases. Medical malpractice claims deal with cases against doctors, nurses, and other healthcare providers when they fail to provide a reasonable standard of care. This means that the healthcare provider did not provide care that met the accepted standard of care within the medical industry. Intentional tort claims are cases where someone has intentionally caused harm to another person. Medical malpractice cases are typically focused on negligence and require that the plaintiff (the person filing the claim) prove that the doctor failed to provide the accepted standard of care. The standard of care can be determined by the actions of other healthcare providers in similar cases. A doctor may be deemed to have been negligent if they failed to do something that a reasonable doctor would have done, or if they did something that was not accepted as part of the standard of care. Intentional tort claims, on the other hand, are focused on intentional acts. This means that the plaintiff (the person filing the claim) has to show that the doctor intentionally acted in a way that caused harm. This could include things like a doctor prescribing a medication without the patient’s knowledge, or a doctor deliberately failing to treat a medical condition. To provide a summary, medical malpractice claims are based on negligence while intentional tort claims are based on an intentional act. In both cases, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant caused harm either through negligence or intentional action.

What is the difference between a medical malpractice claim and an intentional tort claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts