What is comparative negligence and how does it affect a motorcycle accident claim?

Comparative negligence is a legal rule that can be used to help decide who is at fault for an accident and how much a person is responsible for it. When dealing with motorcycle accident claims in Iowa, comparative negligence is one of the issues that can come into play. Comparative negligence compares the negligence of each party involved in an accident, and the percentage of fault is assigned to each party. If someone is found to be more negligent than the other in an accident, they may be liable for most or all of the damages. For example, if a driver runs a stop sign and hits a motorcyclist, the driver is found to be more at fault and the motorcyclist is found to be less at fault. In this case, the motorcyclist may receive compensation for the damages caused by the collision. The amount of compensation a motorcyclist receives will be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them. This is to prevent someone from receiving a large sum of money for an accident in which they were partly responsible. Although comparative negligence is only one issue in a motorcycle accident claim, it can play an important role in determining the amount of compensation a plaintiff can receive. Comparative negligence can reduce the amount of money awarded to plaintiffs, but it is also an important tool for proving liability and can be used to determine who was more negligent in an accident.

Related FAQs

What is comparative negligence and how does it affect a motorcycle accident claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts