What is the difference between a product liability case and a negligent security lawsuit?

A product liability case is a type of lawsuit that alleges that a product was either designed or manufactured with a defect that made it unreasonably dangerous, and ultimately led to injury and/or damages. For example, a product liability case may be brought if a consumer is injured by an appliance that broke due to a design defect, or if a consumer is injured by a malfunctioning drug, or even if a consumer is injured by a malfunctioning seat belt in a vehicle. In contrast, a negligent security lawsuit is a type of civil lawsuit to hold a property owner or business owner accountable for failing to provide adequate security measures on the premises. In Texas, negligent security cases typically involve an assault or other violent crime that could have been prevented if the business owner had chosen to implement reasonable security measures, such as cameras, motion detectors, or adequate lighting. The victim can sue the business owner for damages, such as medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Negligent security is not limited to physical crimes, however. For example, data breaches may also be the result of negligent security practices.

Related FAQs

What should I do if I am a victim of negligent security?
What kind of investigation is required to win a negligent security case?
How can a negligent security lawyer help me?
What are the most common causes of negligent security cases?
What type of evidence do I need to prove negligence in a negligent security case?
How do I know if I should pursue a negligent security claim?
What are the most common defenses to negligent security cases?
What happens when a business is found liable for negligent security?
What kind of compensation can I expect from a negligent security lawsuit?
How are damages awarded in negligent security cases?

What is the difference between a product liability case and a negligent security lawsuit?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts