What are the common defenses raised during a negligent security lawsuit?

When it comes to negligent security law in Washington, there are certain common defenses that are raised during a negligent security lawsuit. These defenses are used by the defendant to try and prove that they are not at fault for the alleged negligent security incident or that they are not liable for any damages that may have been suffered as a result. One common defense is that the plaintiff did not take reasonable steps to avoid the injury. This might involve showing that the plaintiff did not report suspicious activity or take adequate safety precautions in order to protect themselves, such as locking doors or making sure the area is well lit. Another common defense is that the security measures that were in place were reasonable under the circumstances. For example, if the defendant can prove that the security measures were adequate for the area and that other reasonable steps were taken to protect people then they may not be liable for any damages. Finally, a defendant may also argue that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the injury that occurred. This means that they may be able to show that the plaintiff was aware of the risks associated with the area and failed to take steps to protect themselves from potential harm. All of these defenses are used to try and prove that the defendant is not liable for any damages that may have been suffered as a result of the alleged negligent security incident. Each case is unique, so it is important to speak to a qualified attorney to explain your specific situation in more detail.

What are the common defenses raised during a negligent security lawsuit?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts