What is the difference between a parole revocation hearing and a probation revocation hearing?

A parole revocation hearing and a probation revocation hearing are very similar hearings that take place in Kansas. They both involve a situation where a judge needs to decide whether a person should stay on parole or probation, or whether they should be sent back to jail. The difference between the two hearings is what type of violations are being discussed. A parole revocation hearing is held when someone who is on parole (early release from prison) is accused of violating the conditions of their parole. The details of the violation will be discussed in this hearing and the judge will make a decision based on the evidence presented and the type of violation that occurred. The parolee has the right to be represented by a lawyer in the hearing. A probation revocation hearing, on the other hand, is held when someone who is on probation (a form of community based sentence) is accused of violating the conditions of their probation. Similar to a parole revocation hearing, the judge will consider the details of the violation and make a decision based on the evidence presented. The difference here is that the probationer may not have the right to a lawyer in the hearing, as it is typically for less serious violations. Overall, both parole revocation hearings and probation revocation hearings are used to determine if someone should stay on parole/probation or be sent back to jail. The main difference is the type of violation that is being discussed.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a parole revocation hearing and a probation revocation hearing?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts