What are some defenses a manufacturer might make in a product liability case?

In a product liability case in Oregon, a manufacturer might make a number of different defenses to try to reduce their liability. Some of the most common defenses a manufacturer might make include: 1. The product was not defective: The manufacturer might argue that the product was not defective and that any injury or harm suffered by the plaintiff was due to use or misuse of the product. 2. The product was not intended to be used for the purpose it was used: The manufacturer might argue that the product was not intended to be used for the purpose for which it was used, and that the user should have been aware of the risks of using the product in this manner. 3. The manufacturer provided adequate warnings and instructions with the product: The manufacturer might argue that they provided adequate warnings and instructions with the product about the potential risks or hazards associated with it, and that the warning and instructions provided were sufficient. 4. The product was not altered or modified from its original design: The manufacturer might argue that any alterations or modifications to the product were not made by the manufacturer, and that any alterations or modifications were made after the product left their possession. 5. The manufacturer was not negligent: The manufacturer might argue that they were not negligent and that the product was not defective. These are some of the most common defenses a manufacturer might make in a product liability case in Oregon. It is important to note, however, that each case is different and different defenses may be appropriate in a particular case. Therefore, it is important to consult with an experienced attorney to discuss the specific facts of your case in order to determine which defenses may be available.

Related FAQs

What types of proof are required to establish a product liability claim?
Are products with “open and obvious” defects liable?
What is the “learned intermediary doctrine”?
What remedies are available to consumers when a product is found to be unreasonably dangerous?
What is a “warning defect”?
What is the “risk-utility test”?
What type of damages can a plaintiff recover in a product liability case?
Is there a legal standard for determining the “reasonableness” of a product?
What are the elements of a successful products liability claim?
What is the legal standard of care for manufacturers?

What are some defenses a manufacturer might make in a product liability case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts