What remedies are available to consumers when a product is found to be unreasonably dangerous?

In Tennessee, consumers who have been harmed by an unreasonably dangerous product may seek a remedy in order to be compensated for their losses. This can be done through a products liability lawsuit. The basic purpose of a products liability lawsuit is to provide a remedy to consumers when products they purchased fail to meet the expected level of safety and cause harm. In Tennessee, a consumer who pursues a products liability claim can seek both economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages include compensatory damages, which cover any physical harm, medical bills, and lost wages resulting from the injury, as well as punitive damages, which are meant to punish the company that created the dangerous product and act as a deterrent to future instances of negligence. Non-economic damages are intended to compensate for emotional pain and suffering that may have been caused by the injury and can include both mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of life damages. In addition to these remedies, a consumer may also seek an injunction, which is a court order that requires a product to be removed from the market if it is found to be unreasonably dangerous. This type of remedy helps protect other consumers from suffering harm from the same product. Overall, consumers who have been harmed by unreasonably dangerous products in Tennessee have various options when seeking a remedy. These remedies are provided to ensure that those injured can be compensated for their losses and that companies are held accountable when they fail to meet the necessary safety standards and cause harm.

Related FAQs

What is a “market withdrawal”?
What are the differences between design defect and manufacturing defect claims?
What protections does product liability law provide to consumers?
What can consumers do to protect themselves against potential product liability issues?
How does the doctrine of comparative fault apply in product liability cases?
What is the “risk-utility test”?
How does a plaintiff prove that a product was defectively designed?
Are products with “open and obvious” defects liable?
How does a plaintiff establish the “breach of warranty” in a product liability case?
What is a “foreign object defense”?

What remedies are available to consumers when a product is found to be unreasonably dangerous?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts