What is the difference between a restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance?

A restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance are both forms of land use regulation in Alaska. A restrictive covenant is a private agreement between two or more parties about how a certain land can be used. It is used to limit the actions of individuals or organizations, and can be enforced by one of the parties in court. Restrictive covenants may state what type of buildings may be constructed, limit the types of activities allowed on the land, or create other rules for how the land can be used. On the other hand, a zoning ordinance is a form of land use regulation created and enforced by the government. It is used to regulate what land can be used for and how it can be used. Zoning ordinances divide areas into zones and set forth rules about the types of activities that are appropriate in each zone. These rules often dictate the type of building that can be constructed, the number of stories allowed, and other land use restrictions. Overall, the main difference between a restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance is that a restrictive covenant is a private agreement while a zoning ordinance is a government-enforced regulation. Both forms of land use regulation have their advantages, and can help to ensure land is used in a safe and productive manner.

Related FAQs

What are the necessary steps for a real estate closing?
What is a deed of cross-conveyance?
What is a leasehold estate?
How are encumbrances eliminated?
Who owns a property when it is jointly owned?
What is a landlord’s duty to repair?
What is a mortgage?
What is a covenant of warranty?
What is a lease with an option to buy?
What is title search?

What is the difference between a restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts