What is the difference between a restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance?

A restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance are both forms of land use regulation in Alaska. A restrictive covenant is a private agreement between two or more parties about how a certain land can be used. It is used to limit the actions of individuals or organizations, and can be enforced by one of the parties in court. Restrictive covenants may state what type of buildings may be constructed, limit the types of activities allowed on the land, or create other rules for how the land can be used. On the other hand, a zoning ordinance is a form of land use regulation created and enforced by the government. It is used to regulate what land can be used for and how it can be used. Zoning ordinances divide areas into zones and set forth rules about the types of activities that are appropriate in each zone. These rules often dictate the type of building that can be constructed, the number of stories allowed, and other land use restrictions. Overall, the main difference between a restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance is that a restrictive covenant is a private agreement while a zoning ordinance is a government-enforced regulation. Both forms of land use regulation have their advantages, and can help to ensure land is used in a safe and productive manner.

Related FAQs

What is a deed of cross-conveyance?
What is a lease?
What is an agreement to sell?
What should be included in a real estate purchase contract?
What is an encroachments clause?
What is a deed of restrictive covenant?
What are the elements of a valid deed?
What are real estate taxes?
What is a leasehold estate?
What is a deed of trust?

What is the difference between a restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts