What is the difference between a restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance?

A restrictive covenant is a type of legal agreement that is used to limit what property owners can do with their land. This could include prohibiting certain types of businesses from operating in an area or preventing the construction of structures that are not aesthetically pleasing. A restrictive covenant is typically used when a developer or other entity is trying to create a specific type of atmosphere or environment in a neighborhood. On the other hand, a zoning ordinance is a law that is passed by a local government and is meant to limit or regulate the type of land uses and development that can take place. This is usually done to protect the amenities and interests of the community. Zoning ordinances designate certain areas of land for certain purposes, such as residential, commercial, industrial, or agricultural. They also set restrictions on the size and type of construction that can take place in certain locations. In Kansas, both restrictive covenants and zoning ordinances are legally binding and must be enforced by local governments. However, restrictive covenants usually set more specific restrictions than a zoning ordinance. While both are used to limit the use of property, restrictive covenants can provide a greater degree of control over the activities that take place within a certain area.

Related FAQs

What is a deed of partition?
What is an estoppel?
What is a prescriptive easement?
What is an escheat?
What is a covenant of warranty?
What is title insurance?
What is the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act?
What is the “lost document rule”?
What is a lease?
What happens if a title defect is discovered?

What is the difference between a restrictive covenant and a zoning ordinance?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts